Status #18037

https://youtu.be/ROAO1saHEvs [...]


Surprise, Arizona
via Prepare For Change
[deleted user]
I wish there was somebody who can say the same thing in a few sentences and clarify the message in this video. This is such a high scientific level, it's going way over my head.
Sunday 23 October 2016, 18:53:13
kenneth g
He is basically saying that, the whole "radioactivity is dangerous" is another SCAM to enslave us and steal our money. Just another "false flag". I haven't gotten through the whole video yet. But I've watched enough to get the picture and totally believe the guy
Sunday 23 October 2016, 19:38:38
[deleted user]
Yes, that's how far I've come in my understanding, kenneth g. Some of the terminology and most process descriptions went over my head.
But what about this enslavement of us and stealing of our money? You mean building nuclear plants with our tax money? What about Hiroshima
and Nagasaki? And not to forget, Fukushima? Do you mean to suggest that living beings died of other causes and not radiation?
Sunday 23 October 2016, 19:58:11
kenneth g
I m not suggesting any thing. I just put the information there. Do what you want with it. No time for DEBATES.
Sunday 23 October 2016, 20:15:27
[deleted user]
Oh, but I'm not into debates, kenneth g. I'm just trying to understand, not starting a dialogue.
Sunday 23 October 2016, 20:48:58
[deleted user]
Look what I found on the archives.org site, with this video link:

"Nuclear expert that did lectures exposing the scam that is called nuclear danger. He does say that 5 lbs of U235 and 1 lbs of plutonium was used in Japan however, the general idea is that most of the explosion came from the dynamite that these materials were packed in. He mentions depleted uranium as making tanks unnecessary in the 70s since it will ignite air inside the tank and will go through the tank creating an exit flash. He also say that radioactivity is not inheritable, that the cells simply die maybe along with the person. This seems born out by the fully populated cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki today with no inheritable deformation whatsoever.

Says that plutonium can be used as a free independent energy source at the home with no health effects whatsoever but that this is regulated away by the Federal Government for control and profit of the population. Also that the so called storage industry is fake, and that the contents of the nuclear waste stockpiles are probably bodies and other items that must disappear permanently and be totally controlled and handled by the military and other agencies".
Monday 24 October 2016, 12:46:54
kenneth g
I was watching a show called River Monsters. The dude went to Chernobyl thinking he would catch some deformed MONSTER fish. Well those were some of the healthiest fish I'd ever seen. And I wandered then......
So once again our free energy has been right in front of us for almost a century.
My interest in clean energy and having seen a starship, years ago is what led me to PFC. In fact, its not my "area" but I'm building an Off Grid System for someone right now. A friend asked me if I recommended he go Solar and I told him absolutely not. To give it a few years because big changes are coming and the Solar is also another scam. There are much easier ways to get power.
Thank You for posting that. It actually answered a few of my questions.
So Fukashima????
Monday 24 October 2016, 14:20:28
[deleted user]
Did you manage to lay your hands on some nuclear plant material, so that you could create that Off Grid System, kenneth g?
Could you explain a bit more why you think that Solar is a scam and which easier ways you know of, to get power?
I'm interested in this subject, for practical application at some point. I've worked with people choosing to go off grid in communities.
They choose wind energy, solar panels and electricity provided by a fast flowing stream. With a device I don't know how it's called.
And also there's a question knocking on my mindwindow, regarding what causes people to die in a nuclear disaster.
Is the radiation used in treatment of cancer, related to nuclear energy? Don't feel pressed to answer, please respond
in your own time when convenient and welcome to do so, okay? Thank you!


Monday 24 October 2016, 14:49:12
kenneth g
If I had all those answers.......this website would not exist.
Monday 24 October 2016, 14:56:40
Monday 24 October 2016, 14:59:53
kenneth g
In fact...I'd be floating down a river
Monday 24 October 2016, 15:01:18
[deleted user]
Ha ha ha ha..... you've got a priceless sense of humour, lol.
Monday 24 October 2016, 16:14:50
Rob
I found that video with this guy eating supposedly radioactive material and mentioning about that anti-tank bullets from 70's
https://youtube.com/watch/…
Monday 24 October 2016, 19:55:48
Rob
One more thing Pastinakel. You read in that article what was on the first video...
There was no safety regulations and suddenly thay came to exist... Worth watching that first video of this post.
Monday 24 October 2016, 19:59:28
[deleted user]
I've done that already, Rob. The man in that first video is the same as the man visible in the video you posted.
I'm just chewing on this whole clarification about the hoax, treating nuclear waste as poison. I wonder what
caused people's death, in Chernobyl, if there are people who died due to this nuclear disaster.
And what about radiation as cancer treatment, is that something entirely different?
Monday 24 October 2016, 22:08:40
kenneth g
I've got the same questions/concerns. Guess I'll watch the last 30 minutes and see if I get the answers. Obviously radiation IS DEADLY.
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 02:10:59
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 03:22:30
kenneth g
Pastinakel here is answers.
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 03:25:18
kenneth g
Pastinakel here is answers.
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 03:25:22
[deleted user]
Thank you very much, double time, kenneth g, very helpful clarification indeed
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 10:21:52
kenneth g
And then, Chernobyl and Fukishima. I'm not so sure I want to go down that "rabbit hole" ............
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 13:28:50
[deleted user]
Here's another rabbithole, kenneth g. A veterinary doctor, who treated a dog for cancer, was asked why the dog didn't loose his fur, during radiation therapy.
The doctor explained "Animals receive half the dose that humans receive" and than he became self conscious and said "I'm not going to tell you more about it".
Food for thought under your hair :)
Tuesday 25 October 2016, 13:34:41
Please login to make a comment

© 2014 - 2019 Coeō
Coeō © 2014 - 2019 Coeō (Matthew Dowle) | Designed and developed by Matthew Dowle | Coeō Terms and Conditions / Legal | Sitemap