Status #750

I just replied a provate mess-age from mr x I [...]


Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
via The Full Circle Project
I just replied a provate mess-age from mr x I don't know how to join this unedited reply to mr x and the other conversation..i apologise for the long reply..but he asked me to explain about the mark of the beast ..or whatever this came out in reply..[it is as it is] idea where this fits In

i have explained it on other posts..please ask the questions at the thread..i cant figure out how to get back to that page..and if I need explain it too many times ..I have better things to do..than explain it yet again [but as im reposting this publicly..i will go over it again..

.the govt has power over us because we applied to them ..[apply means beg] law one who begs is presumed to know for what he begs..but how we begged is the key*..we applied [begged]..on their form/s*..even worse we swore to be true..certain facts..that we don't know are facts..because we are not swearing true our own truths..[we are swearing true only what govt told us is true..

or we read on out GOVT birth certification..WE DONT KNOW ..its true..thus under law its called hearsay..but yet govt requires us to swear it true..knowing we lie thgus fell into dishonour from the get go..[ie take for example your name...

you parents swore your name to be x Harrison...and by begging govt they own the name...usually its written in black or blue to indicate that your dead..[ie a corporation..]..we formed govt to manage these corporate law they are called person..[to wit in the acts they write this law includes person's [ie their created fictions..another clue lies in the name being in all caps ..indicating a non living corporate person....

you are not have trust over persons..but all ready I see your eyes glazing over..but lets pretend your reading it anyhow and go on..the govt takes your forms as an offer and creates other 'persons under the act'..with things..[persona].. like licence..

[a licence is permission for a 'person' a dead do that otherwise un;lawfull for a 'person' do..[how they trapped us into personhood ../and thus under control of the via all the persons..govt its many forms.

.but here is where you came in..the way we got tricked was by [via]..a uni-lateral contract..but there was no informed concent..nor a meeting of minds [equals]..only the living can make contract..and how we got conned into becoming person under the act is by accepting the under /standing of person via begging..[application]..on their forms [under their seal]..

we were all..enslaved by [via]..signing your name..or rather the name owned by govt put your x..[your sig-nature on the con-tract..and thus gave up all your god given rights to become a mere person..under a govt fiction called an act..[im presuming your still with me..anyhow

the living can make treaty..the living can make contract..because the living have a soul..and have a thing called standing..[each living being has standing under god alone..[and thats it unless you been tricked by deceivers enslaving people with fictions...of person

.[govt..the queen..the crown..are all getting their powers.of person.. from the living..[anything we can collectively do..can be done by any individual..thus govt has the right to put value on paper and call it money..but bankers stole that right from the people..[all living mortal heirs of god alone..who sustains the living our very breath..[not the dead ..they only get life by leacxhing off the works efforts of the living serving a dead corporate fiction..a beast

look all im doing is giving it serve the living..not dead corporate entities....not sates not person not societies..nor as a living being own a fair share of gods just giving your inheritance FROM GOD FORWARD.....KNOWING ANYTHING I GIVE YOU WILL BE RETURNED..OR BE C;LAIMABLE ON YOUR ESTATES ..AFTER YOU MOVE ON..fuck..i hate typing this stuff again and again..and my fat fingers hit capitals so sorry about not yelling..

i have been explaining this to many people over time..i havnt said it all..only a rough guide..for now you seem the only reply..and all that effort hides in your email box..not at the place we made our public offer ...ok move on

.this isnt just for you..this is for everyone....[ALL LIVING ENTITIES.. not corpotsaye fictions or person..thus members join via their mother name..]..and I like explaining things once..then replying SPECIFIC questions..if only to know people are comprehending what im saying.

.the trouble is many have no idea that's why govt has enslaved them..if you don't understand please ask specific questions..nowui have to learn how to put this reply back to the place you could have asked the question..and if I need spell check this blurb..thats that one step too far..i'm..a visionary..noy a writer not a typist not a banker not a person ..and I just want others to do what they do best..thats all we each need to do.

.i explain the complicated stuff..anyhow I am being rough..and im sorry..if you don't understand what im saying look up what the names really mean..thats how I learnt it..word by word..step by step over two decades..and im tired..i mean really really tired....

please don't quote my own/ blurbs back to depresses me seeing how bad I write..i do things as they need doing then move on...I can hardly see my key board at the moment because its dusk..and im too tired to get up and turn the light switch on..[ok cut it and try to find the place to post it..cheers thank you for the ;'question'?..all the best from johan Hendrik/johan nine oug esq
Hi, Yes I think we're on the same page- I'm suing the STATE for contract fraud, denying the court has the right to use the Accused "laws" against me as this would negate their oath of impartiality. Anyone else out there got anything going in court? I'd love to share ideas and experiences.
Wednesday 22 July 2015, 11:57:57
one under god [on strike/on point]
I live in court..for many reasons..but as I have learned..its their court..and as a judge told me once...johan..I cant find in your favour..because my authority comes from the state..your saying I have no power to decide..the state says I do..and that's the truth..[I went to him]..the other thinbg to note that all judges are or were members of the law society ..most were lawyers sworn to serve and protect the law society/by oath..[a lawyers sole duty is to see the courts time isn't I go just to waste their expensive time..[lawyer time will break the system fastyer than wasting cop time..anyhow the contract clear..there were no equal meeting of minds..but like the judge said,..we went and app-lied..[begged]..them..and got only what we begged for..they as I said are not impartial..their all lawyers..the laws got made law written by lawyers for lawyers to judge..and ex lawyers to ratify on appeal..the thing ruled by higher courts instantly becomes how the lower courts must rule..higher courts bind the lower appeals is where change can occur..[but wont]..but who knows we who do-not resist tyrants ..are morally as guilty as they..[ps the bible specifically says in 3 places thy shalt not take oath..and yet all take oath do we..because that's how they screw with us..even those trying to do the right things..see courts were never formed to allow the thinbgs it does now..[ie rule via preceedant]..they used to be a neutral party that audited and stored the investigative record..not the persicuter..who then only allows selective stuff to 'appear' in court..[they do not have an impartiality oath..but suing the statre should be easy..for damages..that has instant 'standing' as an injured party..and standing is everything..hence the first question they usually ask is do you under/ stand under have no standing..its a mine field..but via getting into the court file.. sworn writing..we gain advantage..thats the big thing to get in before the judge begins his/her games..the paper work pre trial is vital...[do not rely on definitions..they have that game coverd..I used definitions as defined in the in the act of acts..[cant recall the name][..but they refuted from a book the protsitutoir read from ..buit wouldn't allow me to read the titkle..and of course the judge went with that..the judge will allways find for the opposing side..unless we produce higher court ruling..[and don't trust the summation,.,.on a few appeals they throw out some preceddant..that didn't in the body of the text mean what the prostitution and the judge ruling said it said..for eg the coin act actually proved my case but the appeal court said the opposite..[it is their court]..who we going to appeal to who isnt in on the scam,./.but damages should be easy to prove....getting the state to admit it was their negligence will be much harder..if they offer means you might be onto something..hence the importance of the pre trial paper..govt can only make laws for their own creations..[ie licence warrents permissions incorporations..[ie persons]..these are benefits.,.[but unfit for purpose..
Wednesday 22 July 2015, 17:55:43
Please login to make a comment

© 2014 - 2020 Coeō
Coeō © 2014 - 2020 Coeō (Matthew Dowle) | Designed and developed by Matthew Dowle | Coeō Terms and Conditions / Legal | Sitemap